<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monte Cook critiques Original D&amp;D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thevintagegamer.net/2009/10/18/monte-cook-critiques-original-dd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thevintagegamer.net/2009/10/18/monte-cook-critiques-original-dd/</link>
	<description>Musings on older board games, computer games, and RPGs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:43:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Vintage Gamer » Blog Archive &#187; Some Links for the New Year</title>
		<link>http://www.thevintagegamer.net/2009/10/18/monte-cook-critiques-original-dd/comment-page-1/#comment-4361</link>
		<dc:creator>The Vintage Gamer » Blog Archive &#187; Some Links for the New Year</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 04:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevintagegamer.net/?p=93#comment-4361</guid>
		<description>[...] Related to this is Monte Cook&#8217;s most recent article at the aforementioned The Escapist magazine about the original supplements to D&amp;D record the evolution of the rules. This is a follow-up to his previous post on D&amp;D, already covered here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related to this is Monte Cook&#8217;s most recent article at the aforementioned The Escapist magazine about the original supplements to D&amp;D record the evolution of the rules. This is a follow-up to his previous post on D&amp;D, already covered here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eduardo Alvarez</title>
		<link>http://www.thevintagegamer.net/2009/10/18/monte-cook-critiques-original-dd/comment-page-1/#comment-4301</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduardo Alvarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevintagegamer.net/?p=93#comment-4301</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve decided to take your post as an indication that a new podcast is on the horizon. Hooray! I know perhaps I&#039;m pushing more than I should, but, any estimates on when we&#039;ll have a new episode?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve decided to take your post as an indication that a new podcast is on the horizon. Hooray! I know perhaps I&#8217;m pushing more than I should, but, any estimates on when we&#8217;ll have a new episode?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for The Vintage Gamer Â» Blog Archive Â» Monte Cook critiques Original D&#38;D [thevintagegamer.net] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thevintagegamer.net/2009/10/18/monte-cook-critiques-original-dd/comment-page-1/#comment-4297</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for The Vintage Gamer Â» Blog Archive Â» Monte Cook critiques Original D&#38;D [thevintagegamer.net] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thevintagegamer.net/?p=93#comment-4297</guid>
		<description>[...] The Vintage Gamer Â» Blog Archive Â» Monte Cook critiques Original D&amp;D  www.thevintagegamer.net/2009/10/18/monte-cook-critiques-original-dd &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  I had planned at some point to cover the original version of Dungeons and Dragons on the podcast. Itâ€™s pretty unlikely at this point that this will happen â€” I planned it all out and found that I... (Read more)I had planned at some point to cover the original version of Dungeons and Dragons on the podcast. Itâ€™s pretty unlikely at this point that this will happen â€” I planned it all out and found that I really didnâ€™t have much to add to the mass of critique and commentary that the game has received. In fact, Iâ€™d say itâ€™s safe to say that this episode, which was to be the next one, has been a factor in the long delay of the podcast in general. I keep trying to rework it and it just doesnâ€™t happen. So in the interest of moving on, check out Monte Cookâ€™s brief critique of the original three books. (Read less) &#8212; From the page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Vintage Gamer Â» Blog Archive Â» Monte Cook critiques Original D&amp;D  <a href="http://www.thevintagegamer.net/2009/10/18/monte-cook-critiques-original-dd" rel="nofollow">http://www.thevintagegamer.net/2009/10/18/monte-cook-critiques-original-dd</a> &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  I had planned at some point to cover the original version of Dungeons and Dragons on the podcast. Itâ€™s pretty unlikely at this point that this will happen â€” I planned it all out and found that I&#8230; (Read more)I had planned at some point to cover the original version of Dungeons and Dragons on the podcast. Itâ€™s pretty unlikely at this point that this will happen â€” I planned it all out and found that I really didnâ€™t have much to add to the mass of critique and commentary that the game has received. In fact, Iâ€™d say itâ€™s safe to say that this episode, which was to be the next one, has been a factor in the long delay of the podcast in general. I keep trying to rework it and it just doesnâ€™t happen. So in the interest of moving on, check out Monte Cookâ€™s brief critique of the original three books. (Read less) &mdash; From the page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
